Personal Finance, Investment Management, and Financial Planning -- What Does and Does Not Work
Main Menu
Site Search
Family Finance Blogs
Low Cost Index Mutual Funds ebook
Easily find all
low cost mutual funds
no load index mutual funds
Available at major ebook stores:
Amazon -- Kindle/MOBI
Apple iBookstore -- iPad/EPUB
Smashwords - EPUB MOBI PDF
Low Cost Exchange Traded Funds ebook

Quickly Find the
Lowest Cost ETFs

low cost exchange traded funds book
Amazon -- Kindle/MOBI
Read These Popular Articles on Our Family Finance Blogs:
no load index mutual funds
Easily find ALL
low cost mutual funds
Available at major ebook stores:

Amazon -- Kindle/MOBI
low cost mutual funds investing book

Apple iBookstore -- iPad/EPUB
no load funds investment guide

Barnes & Noble -- Nook/EPUB
no load funds investing book

Smashwords -- EPUB, MOBI, PDF
index fund investing book

SmartSection is developed by The SmartFactory (http://www.smartfactory.ca), a division of INBOX Solutions (http://inboxinternational.com)

Are Your Best Interests the Same as the Financial Services Industry?
Click any blue bar below to read the article. Backtrack using the links on the line above.
(5204 reads)
Personal financial decisions seem to have become very complicated. To add to the confusion, the financial services industry develops an unending array of supposedly innovative new products. However, a large part of the complexity that individuals face results from the proliferation of repetitive financial products in a myriad of flavors with different features and different financial trade-offs. What is "best" and "right" for individuals easily gets lost in the ensuing confusion.
  View this article in Adobe Acrobat PDF format Print article Send article

(15138 reads)
Individual investors need to understand that their interactions with financial industry intermediaries are a 搝ero-sum game?before transactions and other costs and a 搉egative-sum game?after costs. The industry抯 visible fees and hidden costs can siphon away a significant part of potential returns without providing individual investors with commensurate value.
  View this article in Adobe Acrobat PDF format Print article Send article

(10723 reads)
Historical investment performance charts for investment funds might be historically accurate, but their presentation in advertising, on line, and in printed materials can amount to lies from several perspectives. Performance charts are designed to lure gullible individual investors with an implied promise that superior past performance will continue. The financial research literature tells us clearly that on average this is a promise that cannot be kept. In other words, historical performance charts are a veiled lie. They may report factual information, but their purpose is to deceive.
  View this article in Adobe Acrobat PDF format Print article Send article

(5700 reads)
The securities industry and many of its brokers and investment advisors know that low cost index strategies are better for individual investors. However, the "active-management-beat-the-market" industry crowd will not make any money off of you, if they tell you that. They have to push the "we deliver superior performance" mantra, because that is the justification for their excessively high and performance killing fees. Since market realities make it virtually impossible for actively managed funds to consistently beat the market after their fees, they have to resort to promises, deceptions, and "statistical" lies. These lies include: #1 selecting only winners to promote, #2 easy index benchmarking, and #3 hard to interpret cumulative historical performance charts.
  View this article in Adobe Acrobat PDF format Print article Send article

(10294 reads)
Securities industry customers have very widespread concerns about being taken advantage of and being cheated. Particularly since the Internet bubble market crash, investor surveys have shown that investor distrust of the industry is high.
  View this article in Adobe Acrobat PDF format Print article Send article

(34825 reads)
The amount of profit in a transaction is far more important to a securities firm than whether it is the most beneficial alternative for a client. The financial interests of individual investors and the financial services industry firms are fundamentally at odds. Professional 揳dvice?from commissioned securities sales personnel very often has a well-disguised and significant tilt toward the financial self-interest of the organizations that these professionals represent.
  View this article in Adobe Acrobat PDF format Print article Send article

(10295 reads)
In a 2 to 1 decision this morning (March 30, 2007), the US Court of Appeals struck down the US Securities and Exchange Commission's rule on fee based broker accounts, which as become commonly known as the "Merrill Lynch Rule." This rule was first proposed in late 1999 and formally adopted in 2005. This rule allowed stockbrokers to act as "advisors" and to charge percent of assets fees. Prior to this rule, only investment advisors who registered with the SEC or with the states and who were regulated under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 were permitted to do this. Under the Merrill Lynch Rule, brokers could call themselves advisers, yet remain exempt from regulation under the Investment Advisers Act, as amended.
  View this article in Adobe Acrobat PDF format Print article Send article

(7844 reads)
The biggest personal finance story of the past 30 years has been the dramatic growth of the market capitalization of financial services firms within the U.S. equity markets!

The reason that this is so important to your personal finances is pretty straightforward. Simply put, most individuals pay far too much for financial products and services. Their continuing over payments show up in the increasing value of financial services company stocks. People have paid far too much for years, and the industry's excessive charges have been increasing for years.
  View this article in Adobe Acrobat PDF format Print article Send article

(4426 reads)
The Financial sector has grown to be almost twice the value of the Energy sector in S&P500 market capitalization. Nevertheless, we have not heard a widespread media clamor about escalating financial services costs and profits. Instead, all we hear about are financial scandals related to greed, fraud, and scams.

Things will NOT be okay after a few tweaks to the regulatory system and a few perp walks. Individuals have in the past and apparently will in the future continue to pay exorbitant banking, credit card, insurance, and securities costs. The wealth transfer will continue unabated.
  View this article in Adobe Acrobat PDF format Print article Send article

(3568 reads)
There is no reason to believe that industry self-regulation or governmental regulation will ever fix these problems. Only those individuals who become wise enough to be proactive and seek out lower cost financial products will stop getting fleeced. The vast majority or individuals will just keep on paying excessive costs to the financial industry, while they receive inadequate value in return.
  View this article in Adobe Acrobat PDF format Print article Send article

(5140 reads)
What does it mean to individual investors that the financial services industry is now about 21% of S&P 500 market capitalization?

The answer is relatively simple. The securities markets tell you that financial stocks are highly profitable and have earnings that are expected to continue to do so in the future. The markets are telling you that it is unlikely that any business or regulatory factors will intervene to reduce financial services company revenue growth and/or to shrink their profit margins.
  View this article in Adobe Acrobat PDF format Print article Send article

(3664 reads)
This article concludes our series on the greatest personal finance story of the past thirty years. In this article, we discuss whether the dramatic growth in equity value of the financial services sector indicates that securities markets are becoming less efficient.

Some might look at the financial services sector's current 21% share of S&P 500 market capitalization and assume that the securities markets are "not efficient." This is not necessarily the case. A far more compelling argument is that much of this growth results from a wealth transfer from individuals to the industry.
  View this article in Adobe Acrobat PDF format Print article Send article

RSS Feed

These links will take you to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy and our Copyright Policy

This site is solely for informational and educational purposes related to your personal, private, and non-commercial use.
  • In no way does this site constitute or provide investment advice under the laws and regulations of the United States of America and its various States or of any other country in the world.
  • This site does not collect any specific information on the investment situation of any reader.
  • In no way does this site constitute a solicitation or offer to sell securities of any kind.
  • It is not a solicitation or offer to sell advisory services in any jurisdiction. You should seek professional advice, if you need help with budgeting, savings, investing, asset allocation or asset management, including help in analyzing calculator returns, discounted cash flow, compound interest growth, return on investment, net present value, future values, net worth or any other output of our calculators.

This site is a financial publication of general and regular circulation. Except for reading and browsing via the World Wide Web, no part of this document or website may be reproduced, modified, disseminated, published, adapted in any manner or transferred without permission in writing from Lawrence Russell and Company.

Unless otherwise stated, there are no business arrangements of any kind between The Skilled Investor and any mutual fund, ETF, or other investment security or any company that may be featured in our articles. We do not accept any payments to influence what we write about or what we say. The Skilled Investor does allow advertisers to post their messages on our site, and it is entirely your choice whether or not to patronize any of these advertisers.


"The Skilled Investor", "Skilled Investor", "VeriPlan", "Fund Authority," "Fund Authority Score," "Personal Finance Software for Your Lifetime", "Your Personal Financial Lifecycle Planner", and "Sensible and Scientific Financial and Investment Planning" are some of the trademarks of Lawrence Russell and Company. Other trademarks and service marks are the properties of their respective owners. Watering can photo by Alan Cleaver from Flickr.com

© Copyright 2005 to 2020 - Lawrence Russell and Company, All rights reserved worldwide. The particular year of the copyright will depend upon the year of first publication.